Home Rule – Ballinger TX http://ballingertx.org/ Sun, 09 Jan 2022 02:26:48 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://ballingertx.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/icon-150x150.png Home Rule – Ballinger TX http://ballingertx.org/ 32 32 Oregon wants quick fix to high lead levels in Portland water https://ballingertx.org/oregon-wants-quick-fix-to-high-lead-levels-in-portland-water/ Sat, 08 Jan 2022 23:15:00 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/oregon-wants-quick-fix-to-high-lead-levels-in-portland-water/ It has been six years since Dr. Marc Edwards first identified toxic levels of lead in water in Flint, Michigan. Since then, Professor Virginia Tech – credited alongside her colleague with calling the world’s attention to a brewing water crisis in Flint – has become baffled by lead levels in another city: Portland, Oregon. Edwards, […]]]>

It has been six years since Dr. Marc Edwards first identified toxic levels of lead in water in Flint, Michigan.

Since then, Professor Virginia Tech – credited alongside her colleague with calling the world’s attention to a brewing water crisis in Flint – has become baffled by lead levels in another city: Portland, Oregon. Edwards, who specializes in water treatment, is blunt: “It’s worse than Flint.

Portland’s Bull Run Reservoir is the main source of drinking water for the City of Portland, but regulators say its water is corrosive and can cause lead solder in older pipes to rupture and leach into the tank. stagnant water, creating health risks.

Amelia Templeton / OPB

“In Flint, it lasted 18 months. ” he said. “It was a national and international outcry, thousands of stories, dozens of documentary films. … In Portland, they are above action level again and this has been going on for several decades.

In recent years, Flint’s water has become synonymous with environmental disaster. Portland’s water, meanwhile, is considered one of the most pristine in the country, though the city’s lead levels typically stay just below – and sometimes exceed – the federal safe limit of 15 parts per. billion (or ppb). If test samples contain lead levels above 15 ppb, the Environmental Protection Agency requires the utility to take action to reduce the amount of lead, such as updating old pipes or treating water. .

The Portland Water Bureau takes issue with the comparison to Flint’s water problem. In Flint, the water was contaminated by lead service lines that touched most of the homes and buildings in the community. Water office spokesperson Jaymee Cuti said the main source of lead in Portland water is copper pipes with lead solder in less than 10% of homes and buildings.

But the city faces its own unique chronic lead problem, and state health regulators are calling for a quick fix.

Last November, the water office received alarming water samples. Of 104 homes with lead components in their household plumbing sampled by the water bureau, 10% had lead levels above 21 parts per billion – the highest results the city has seen in two decades and well beyond. above the federal limit.

Two homes sampled had lead levels more than five times above the EPA limit – 105 ppb and 81 ppb, according to a letter from the Oregon Health Authority obtained by the OPB.

For Edwards, the results were the latest reminder that Portland’s water officials have failed for years to significantly reduce the city’s lead levels. For the Oregon Health Authority, it was a sign that they had to intervene.

Health regulators crack down

On December 14, the drinking water division of the Oregon Health Authority sent a letter to the director of the Portland Water Bureau, Gabriel Solmer.

“Drinking Water Services (DWS) is very concerned about the recent exceedance of the primary action level,” wrote Technical Director Kari Salis. “As you know, there is no lead exposure level without danger.”

Since the late 1990s, samples have shown Portland to exceed the federal lead level 11 times. In 2017, after Portland surpassed that threshold again, the OHA asked the water office to build a corrosion control treatment facility, according to Salis’ letter. The water in the Bull Run watershed is naturally corrosive, which can lead to lead infiltration from plumbing and copper fixtures into homes. By building a facility to make Portland water less corrosive, the office hopes to reduce the amount of lead dissolving from old plumbing in standing water. Installation is expected to be completed by April.

But with lead samples at the highest levels since 2000, the Oregon Health Authority is calling for a faster solution.

The agency asked the water bureau to provide a plan of “additional short-term measures” by Friday. OHA spokesperson Jonathan Modie said the agency expects, at a minimum, the plan to include “further adjustments to treatment, as well as increased public education and awareness.” .

Water bureau spokesman Jaymee Cuti said the two agencies “are working together on a plan to best protect vulnerable people and all who drink our water.”

The bureau says their test results show that less than 7% of homes built between 1970 and 1985 have high levels of lead in their drinking water.

Senior expert recommends water filters

Lead can affect almost any organ, with exposure particularly harmful to the body and mind of pregnant people and children. The toxin puts children at increased risk for learning and behavior problems, including attention deficit disorder, and it puts mothers at a higher likelihood of miscarriage, according to the EPA.

While the EPA requires utilities to take action when lead levels exceed 15 ppb, Dr Bruce Lanphear, who has studied lead poisoning for 25 years, said lead in drinking water may have adverse health effects once levels reach 5 ppb. He recommends that Portland residents in high-risk homes use filters for their water.

The water bureau reports that the homes most exposed to lead in water are those with copper pipes connected to lead solder, which were typically built or leaded between 1970 and 1985. This potentially accounts for up to ‘to 15,000 homes, according to the bureau. Twice a year, Portland will sample the water from homes at greatest risk, those built between 1983 and 1985.

Edwards Professor Virginia Tech said Portland holds the distinction as the largest city consistently showing high levels of lead in their water samples for high-risk homes. He puts the blame on the Portland Water Bureau and an unusual arrangement made decades ago with the state health authority.

Through the Lead and Copper Rule, the EPA regulates the amount of lead allowed in drinking water and requires utilities to take action if lead levels exceed a threshold of 15 ppb. In 1997, the state allowed Portland to come up with a unique answer to the rule. Instead of treating water like other cities were doing, Portland launched a program that would focus on education, awareness and repair of lead paint in homes with children, according to a 2016 survey. by The Oregonian.

This investigation found that this one-of-a-kind deal meant that Portland had effectively bypassed general EPA regulations to minimize lead in the water supply. The water bureau did not need to follow federal rules that require the addition of chemicals to water to reduce pipe corrosion and prevent the release of lead, the report said.

Cuti, the spokesperson for the water bureau, said the city has followed the lead and copper rule since its inception.

“Our regulators have approved a plan to tackle the most common sources of lead exposure in our community, including lead-based paint and drinking water,” she wrote.

New treatment facility planned

Since then, the city has changed course. The water bureau said it expects the new corrosion control facility, where the water will be treated with soda ash and carbon dioxide, to significantly reduce lead levels in Portland.

To measure the impact this installation will have, the water bureau has launched a two-year study of 40 people so officials can see how lead levels in high-risk homes improve after the installation is online.

For Christine Prapas, the change in treatment does not come soon enough.

Prapas, a retired artist, has lived in her southwest Portland neighborhood at Garden Home House since 1991. Her house was 10 years old when she bought it, built during a time when lead in plumbing was common .

Last January, Prapas received a note from the water office asking him to participate in the study. In return for sending monthly water samples, she would get a reduced water bill and monthly analysis for lead in her water.

She started sending samples from her kitchen sink in June of last year. Since then, she has seen her test numbers increase. Seven months of results reviewed by OPB show that its samples fell from 12.9 ppb on June 14 to 18.9 ppb on December 2.

From the first result, Prapas started using a lead filter for his tap. But she worries about people in older homes like hers who have never received a letter from the water office.

“You can’t boil lead,” she says. “It affects infants, it affects us all.”

The water office said it is working in close coordination with the OHA and expects to be able to deliver its lead reduction plan early next week once it has been reviewed by the authority. sanitary.

The water office offers free lead in water testing to all residential customers and child care providers. People can contact LeadLine at leadline.org or at 503-988-4000 to receive a free lead in water test.

Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to include a response from the Portland Water Bureau and to clarify the contents of the Oregon Health Authority letter to the city.


Source link

]]>
It’s up to you: should my sister stop bringing strangers to our roommate? | Sex https://ballingertx.org/its-up-to-you-should-my-sister-stop-bringing-strangers-to-our-roommate-sex/ Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:00:00 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/its-up-to-you-should-my-sister-stop-bringing-strangers-to-our-roommate-sex/ The charge: Mafalda I’m not against my sister who goes out and has fun, but she also has to respect my limits Before my older sister Mariana moved in last summer, I had my own space and my own routine in this apartment. I was nervous because she is so outgoing and I knew our […]]]>

The charge: Mafalda

I’m not against my sister who goes out and has fun, but she also has to respect my limits

Before my older sister Mariana moved in last summer, I had my own space and my own routine in this apartment. I was nervous because she is so outgoing and I knew our lifestyles were different. Mariana loves going out, meeting new people and partying, even though I’m really not into all of that.

We made some rules right away, one of which was that we couldn’t have strangers here. I knew when my sister was living in college she would throw parties that got out of hand, so I said, “Only friends and friends of friends, no strangers. She didn’t like it and said that everything she does in her room should be her business, but I argued that it was a shared space and I wanted to feel safe. Mariana is much freer than I am, sexually and socially, but I told her she had to compromise and she finally agreed.

The first night I left her alone, Mariana threw a big party with a group she met at a club. It was very crowded in our apartment when I got back and the floor was sticky. The next morning, Mariana apologized, saying things had gotten out of hand; she looked so sorry that I let her down.

But about two months later she brought a random guy back for the night. She called at 2am that night to let me know and told me he was a friend of a friend who had lost his keys. She said it would be stuck if we didn’t let it crash so I agreed. But when I started chatting with them, it quickly became clear that the story wasn’t right.

I simmered everything the next morning; then Mariana confessed that she made up the story because she wanted it to stay. We got into a huge fight. Mariana thought I had overreacted but she broke my trust in a random guy, so what was she expecting?

Since then, Mariana has not brought anyone back (to my knowledge). I’m not against her casually going out, but she has to respect my limits. I also think it’s better for her to get to know someone before bringing them home. This rule is not to control it; it’s about protecting her and our shared space – why can’t she see it?

Sign up for our Inside Saturday newsletter for an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at the making of the magazine’s biggest articles, as well as a curated list of our weekly highlights.

Defense: Mariana

I’ve had some arguing with my younger sister about my love life – I’m offended that she doesn’t trust mee

My sister is special to have boys in the apartment. She’s younger than me, still in college, and has less experience in relationships. But I’m in my mid-twenties and the rule makes a big difference in my life. Before living with Mafalda, I lived with a friend and we did whatever we wanted. I’m sexually comfortable and used to bringing people into my space.

After my sister and I agreed on the rule, I was still really on the defensive. I said it was my room and my space.

When I first party, Mafalda wasn’t even there most of the night. There wasn’t much to apologize for while I cleaned up the mess. I had planned to invite a few people, but lots of people showed up at the door. However, I knew most of them.

We had a lot of arguments about my love life. Mafalda said if I had been dating for a while she would be fine, but if it was the first or second date she wouldn’t want them. She would feel uncomfortable. I was offended that she didn’t trust my judgment. Does she think I’m going for terrible and dangerous guys? She once said that I shouldn’t be having casual sex, which annoyed me – it’s none of her business. I tried to explain that I would never bring someone back who would put me in a dangerous situation, let alone her.

This time I brought a guy back and lied to him was stupid. Mafalda believed in it for a while, but we were clearly drunk and mentions. Afterwards, she and I had a big argument and she didn’t speak to me for days. I tried to apologize but she got really mad. Mafalda kept repeating that I had no regard for his well-being. She blew it all up, especially when I’m the one who cleans the house and cooks dinners – she forgot all about it.

After a few days we had a long conversation. Now ideally if I want to bring a guy home I’m going to prepare Mafalda and make sure she’s heard of him before so it’s no surprise. But there may be times when it doesn’t work or she doesn’t approve, and I can’t stop living my life at her convenience.

The Guardian Readers Jury

Should Mariana stop bringing strangers into the apartment?

Mariana is guilty of having reneged on the agreement she made with Mafalda. If Mariana thinks the conditions are turning out to be too restrictive, she must either try to find a new compromise or find another place to live.
Julie, 67 years old

Mariana should be allowed to bring random people back to her room and, when her sister is out, be allowed to party if she’s cleaning up afterwards. Mafalda should realize that it is safer for Mariana to bring random men back to her house than to go to them.
Coquelicot, 38 years old

Mariana seems to have been forced to come to terms with a rule that does not meet her needs. The moment she lied about the guy’s keys is a natural reaction – we’re breaking any rules we don’t agree with and haven’t made.
Alex, 35

Sure, Mariana wants to have fun in her twenties, but not bringing strangers back to the apartment is a small compromise. She is also naive if she thinks she can identify a “dangerous guy” on a first meeting.
Miranda, 22

Despite all the talk of compromise, the rule is Mafalda’s, and Mariana’s “breach of the rule” since then makes it clear that this was neither a negotiation nor an agreed truce. Perhaps the seeds for real compromise are to be found in Mariana’s final statement – fair warning as often as possible, and trust where it isn’t.
Richard, 39 years old

Be the judge

So now you can be the judge, click on the poll below to tell us: Should Mariana stop bringing strangers into the apartment?

We’ll share the results next week, it’s up to you.

Voting will close on Thursday, January 13 at 9:00 a.m. GMT

The result of last week

We asked if Roland should pay more rent, since he earns more than her boyfriend, James.

53% of you said no – Roland is innocent
47% of you said yes – Roland is guilty

Do you have a dispute that you would like to settle? Or do you want to be part of our jury? Click here


Source link

]]>
Miami-Dade Freeway Authority wins legal battle with state https://ballingertx.org/miami-dade-freeway-authority-wins-legal-battle-with-state/ Wed, 05 Jan 2022 04:09:19 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/miami-dade-freeway-authority-wins-legal-battle-with-state/ Written by Gabriela Henriquez Stoikow on January 4, 2022 Advertising The Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) has just won two court decisions in its dispute over the operations and control of five toll highways in the county against the state-created Greater Miami Expressway Agency (GMX). Florida’s Eleventh Circuit Judge William Thomas has dismissed a motion to […]]]>
Written by Gabriela Henriquez Stoikow on January 4, 2022

Advertising

The Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) has just won two court decisions in its dispute over the operations and control of five toll highways in the county against the state-created Greater Miami Expressway Agency (GMX).

Florida’s Eleventh Circuit Judge William Thomas has dismissed a motion to dismiss MDX’s claim against GMX that it owns, controls and owns the $ 4 billion in assets it operates. He also recognized Miami-Dade County as a necessary party in the litigation.

But the judge dismissed the authority’s request for a preliminary injunction that would maintain the status quo while the courts render a final decision in the case. A 20-minute hearing is still scheduled for January 18.

Jason Gonzalez of Shutts & Bowen LLP, representing GMX and members of its board of directors, has argued in previous hearings and documents that MDX should either bring the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to the case or abandon it, because FDOT “is an indispensable part”.

Nonetheless, Judge Thomas concluded that FDOT is not an indispensable party and no longer has any interest in the rights that it transferred to MDX. Further, he wrote that the agreement in which the ministry transferred the rights to MDX to maintain and operate the highways in the county has no right of reversion which would give a basis for recognizing FDOT as a party. .

Mr. Gonzalez also argued that MDX did not have standing under the public official standing doctrine. But Judge Thomas found that MDX’s claims against GMX do not involve a constitutional challenge to the validity of state law; instead, the authority is looking for a court ruling that would state that MDX owns the highways.

GMX’s defense argues that MDX does not have the legal capacity to bring legal action because it was dissolved on July 3, 2019. But Judge Thomas noted that an amendment to the domestic rule Prohibits the legislature from passing bills that apply only to Miami-Dade County, and that the county can declare a bill unconstitutional and invalid, as it did in a May 2021 ordinance.

“The Miami-Dade County order has not been challenged in any court,” Judge Thomas wrote.

The judge also recognized Miami-Dade as a necessary party in the case, as he referred to Florida statutes, scoring MDX’s second victory.
MDX sought a temporary injunction to preserve the status quo and prevent GMX from taking further action to “derogate” from MDX’s rights, but Judge Thomas dismissed the motion, ruling that MDX did not meet two requirements.

MDX “cannot demonstrate irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction,” he wrote, noting that MDX’s harm is financial and can be remedied by a monetary judgment. “It is the conclusion of this court that MDX is essentially seeking an injunction to stop the redirection of toll revenues to GMX,” the judge wrote.

The judge said that MDX had an adequate remedy because, if it succeeded in establishing its right to operate and control the highways, it would be entitled to pecuniary damages and would therefore have “an adequate remedy in law. “.

But Judge Thomas found that MDX met two other requirements. “It is the opinion of this tribunal that MDX has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits in the pending action,” Judge Thomas wrote. He also wrote that it is in the public interest that highways are operated and maintained in an undisturbed and safe manner.


Source link

]]>
Jan.6 committee penetrates Trump’s West Wing obstruction wall https://ballingertx.org/jan-6-committee-penetrates-trumps-west-wing-obstruction-wall/ Mon, 03 Jan 2022 05:57:00 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/jan-6-committee-penetrates-trumps-west-wing-obstruction-wall/ Committee chairman Bennie Thompson, a Democrat from Mississippi, told CNN’s “State of the Union” panel that the panel had “important testimony” that shows the White House was asked to “do something. As the crowd of Trump supporters ignited for his election. fantasies made their way to the Capitol. Vice President Liz Cheney, a Republican from […]]]>

Committee chairman Bennie Thompson, a Democrat from Mississippi, told CNN’s “State of the Union” panel that the panel had “important testimony” that shows the White House was asked to “do something. As the crowd of Trump supporters ignited for his election. fantasies made their way to the Capitol. Vice President Liz Cheney, a Republican from Wyoming, told ABC News “firsthand testimony” that Trump’s daughter Ivanka, then West Wing adviser, twice asked her to intervene in a melee in which the police were beaten by his mob.

Thursday’s anniversary will revisit the horrors of the bombing, before which Trump told his supporters to “fight like hell” to support his plot to steal power from Joe Biden in violation of the expressed will of the people in a democratic election.
And now the comments from the committee leadership shed new light on the motivation behind the ex-president’s quest to keep documentary evidence of his role a secret on January 6, which reached the U.S. Supreme Court. They also explain the refusal of many of Trump’s closest associates and henchmen to speak to the committee about what exactly he was doing in the Oval Office. It’s increasingly clear that these appearances could force them to choose between telling the truth under oath and crossing paths with their former boss, who still dominates the GOP. Two of those Trump allies – his former political guru Steve Bannon and former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows – have already received criminal contempt referrals from the Justice Department from the committee and across the board. from the room. Bannon will go on trial in July.

But this week’s events will also underscore that a year later, Trump’s enormous power over the GOP and the complicity of many of its key leaders in his fraudulent lies mean that America’s democracy is in greater trouble and suffering. assaults wider than ever.

A broader picture of dereliction of duty

Thompson and Cheney’s comments will also fuel the growing impression that the committee, which conducted several hundred interviews, built a detailed behind-the-scenes picture of what happened inside Trump’s West Wing. on an infamous day in American history. Some of this evidence has already emerged in journalistic accounts of what happened during the insurgency. But the committee’s eventual final report would have the capacity to create a definitive record for history – and for future voters – on the truth about the attack.

There were further signs on Sunday that the committee was making inroads in seeking funding for the rally at the Ellipse in Washington, DC, which Trump addressed with his inflammatory lies about voter fraud on January 6. Thompson expressed concern over “the State of the Union” over the possibility of financial fraud in connection with the event.

“We have not made these concerns public at this point. But we think it is of great concern to us that people have raised money for an activity, and we cannot find the money spent on that activity. special, ”he said.

The president also notably refused to rule out the idea that the committee could take the extraordinary step of sacking Trump to the Justice Department. While it is not clear whether the entire committee would agree to such a move, it would raise the possibility that an administration’s attorney general is considering an indictment of the president of the previous White House, a conundrum. which could throw more oil on a political hell raging in this year of midterm elections.

“We don’t know… If there is anything that we come across as a committee that we think would warrant a referral to the Department of Justice, we will,” Thompson told Dana Bash. Cheney added on CBS that Trump was guilty of a “supreme dereliction of duty” and that the committee was looking to determine whether there was a need for “increased penalties” for such behavior, although she appeared to be referring to a legislation that would probably not be applicable. retrospective on Trump’s conduct.

“Not suitable for the office”

Cheney, however, warned that Trump’s conduct was so blatant that he should no longer be allowed to step closer to power, as the former president considers a potential new tilt in the White House in 2024.

“He is a man who has demonstrated that he is at war with the rule of law. He has demonstrated that he is ready to break down all the safeguards of democracy,” Cheney said on Sunday on “Face” the Nation ”from CBS News. “And he will never be able to be near the Oval Office again.”

On the face of it, the Commander-in-Chief’s refusal to intervene to stop an assault on the citadel of American democracy during Biden’s election certification process is a blatant violation of his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. .

But even a deeply damning report from the committee seems unlikely to break the dynamic of denial in the GOP over Trump’s transgressions.

The year after the U.S. Capitol bombing, judges remind us of what it means to be American
A new poll, for example, from the Washington Post and the University of Maryland shows that only 27% of Republicans think the former president deserves “a lot” or “a lot” of blame for the Jan.6 attack on the Capitol. .

Such data, which reflects a year of lies from Trump and the conservative media, helps explain why the House GOP in particular anchored its hopes of capturing a majority in the midterm elections in loyalty to the ex-president. insurrectional. Apart from Cheney and the other Republican on the select committee, Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger, much of the Republican Conference is either participating in or encouraging the whitewashing of history.

Trump has already announced that he will give new impetus to a process that has convinced millions of grassroots supporters of the lie that he has been cheated from power and should still be president, with a press conference at his luxury club Mar-a-Lago in Florida Thursday. The ex-president plans to argue that the real insurgency took place in the November 2020 election – which Biden won in a free and fair vote – and not on January 6, even though the attack on Capitol Hill did took place before the eyes of the world and there is no evidence of electoral fraud in 2020.

“We want to check everything”

The committee dwells on what it says is the crucial 187 minutes between the start of the insurgency on Capitol Hill and Trump’s message to supporters to go home. Thompson hinted that there were signs the ex-president attempted to tape several previous messages, but his words apparently did not match the time sufficiently and were not released by the White House. This is one of the reasons the committee wants the Supreme Court to allow it to review documents, texts, emails and memos on which Biden has refused to assert executive privilege but which Trump does not want to be. delivered. After several previous reversals in court, the ex-president appealed on Christmas Eve to the conservative majority of the Supreme Court that he helped build.

“We have significant testimony that leads us to believe the White House was ordered to do something,” Thompson told Bash on Sunday. “We want to verify all of this, so that when we produce our report and when we hold the hearings, the public has the opportunity to see for themselves.”

The President added: “The only thing I can say is that it is very unusual for someone in charge of anything to watch what is going on and not do anything.”

Cheney also weighed in on these pivotal moments, adding to the stories in the “I Alone Can Fix It” books by Washington Post reporters Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker and “Peril” by Post reporters Bob Woodward and Robert Costa.

“We know her daughter – we have firsthand testimony that her daughter Ivanka came in at least twice to ask her ‘please stop this violence’,” Cheney told ABC News “This week “.

Cheney’s willingness to seek the truth of January 6, which sets her apart from many of her Republican colleagues in the House, saw her ostracized by her party. She has lost a leadership position at the Republican House Conference and is being challenged by a Trump-backed main challenger. But she still expressed hope on CBS on Sunday that a committee trashed by Trump’s allies on Capitol Hill could produce evidence with the power to change the minds of skeptics. She also had a challenge for her party, much of which has long chosen to protect Trump and ignore the truth for political purposes.

“Our party has to choose. We can either be loyal to Donald Trump or be loyal to the Constitution, but we cannot be both,” she said.


Source link

]]>
Marie Kondo’s wardrobe trick to stay organized all year round https://ballingertx.org/marie-kondos-wardrobe-trick-to-stay-organized-all-year-round/ Sat, 01 Jan 2022 12:00:51 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/marie-kondos-wardrobe-trick-to-stay-organized-all-year-round/ From the kitchen to the bedroom, Marie Kondo’s storage techniques have revolutionized cleaning habits around the world. However, her final tip revolved around one of the most notorious spaces to keep tidy: the closet. Mistress of storage of Japanese origin, Marie Kondo has acquired worldwide prestige after her book The magic of storage that changes […]]]>

From the kitchen to the bedroom, Marie Kondo’s storage techniques have revolutionized cleaning habits around the world. However, her final tip revolved around one of the most notorious spaces to keep tidy: the closet.

Mistress of storage of Japanese origin, Marie Kondo has acquired worldwide prestige after her book The magic of storage that changes life. Since then, she has shared her storage ideas with the world through her Netflix show. Clean up with Marie Kondo.

Addressed exclusively to Houses and gardens, Marie Kondo revealed that when it comes to keeping your wardrobe organization ideas tidy, she has a special order she relies on in her own home.

Marie kondo

(Image credit: KonMari Media, Inc.)

Hang in order of length



Source link

]]>
Judge wants to hear town of Aspen over moratorium https://ballingertx.org/judge-wants-to-hear-town-of-aspen-over-moratorium/ Wed, 29 Dec 2021 05:30:00 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/judge-wants-to-hear-town-of-aspen-over-moratorium/ Aspen City Council’s temporary stop on residential development and short-term rental permit applications, which came into effect immediately by an emergency ordinance it passed on December 8, will remain in place for now. . Judge John Neiley’s written decision came on Tuesday in response to a case filed by lawyers for the Aspen Real Estate […]]]>

Aspen City Council’s temporary stop on residential development and short-term rental permit applications, which came into effect immediately by an emergency ordinance it passed on December 8, will remain in place for now. .

Judge John Neiley’s written decision came on Tuesday in response to a case filed by lawyers for the Aspen Real Estate Board, which requested a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to prevent the city from enforcing the order. Through the company Aspen Garfield & Hecht PC, the TRO motion was filed on Monday at 11:30 p.m. in Pitkin County District Court and came 11 hours after the board of directors filed a complaint about the same question.

Neiley’s order said he could not issue an ex parte TRO, which would have been granted without knowing the city’s position.



“At this early stage of the litigation, the court is not inclined to question the city’s decision-making process, let alone issue a restraining order against it ex parte,” the judge wrote in a four-page letter. and a half pages. decision. “The court is not inclined to issue an ex parte restraining order against the city on such a thin case. The City deserves an opportunity to be heard.

The board’s complaint and the TRO motion argued that the city council deprived the public of due process and violated the city’s charter of autonomy and land use code by passing an ordinance under the auspices of an emergency.



An emergency ordinance can be passed in an unusually quick order, which the city council did on December 7 and 8 by approving the moratorium. Typical ordinances are publicly notified and take longer to pass, first by passing a first reading, then at least seven days before a public hearing is held and when a second reading is voted on by the government. advice.

City council moratoria on residential development and short-term rentals came in the form of Emergency Ordinance 27.

Part of the urgency to pass the moratorium, according to Ordinance 27, was the environmental damage caused by residential development activity in Aspen, which “contributes to climate change through the transportation required to build and maintain residential properties, the energy and the impacts inherent in the creation and supply of materials required for residential development, the consumption of natural resources required for the operation of residential structures, and the generation of solid waste and associated disposal impacts resulting from the construction and operation of residential structures.

Further, the ordinance stated that “man-made climate change and its impacts on the ecological and economic health of the community constitute an emergency and a threat to the health and safety of residents of the town of Aspen and of the world community ”.

Short-term rentals, which do not exceed 30 days, have also changed the real estate landscape in Aspen, according to the ordinance, noting that “recent developments in the residential real estate market and economy, including new financial dynamics, the proliferation of term rentals, have made elements of the land use code inadequate to meet local needs for affordable housing.

Garfield & Hecht attorney Chris Bryan, who is advocating on behalf of the board, said on Tuesday that other government jurisdictions have passed moratoriums related to STRs and development, but not through the fast-track means of declaring a emergency.

“Due process is important and this is a big problem, and we allege that this emergency ordinance was not made in accordance with the city’s own law,” he said, adding that the ordinance draws sweeping conclusions and lacks details to justify an emergency.

Neiley’s order denying the TRO affected the due process argument.

“(Aspen Board of Realtors) is correct that if the city fails to abide by its charter and land use code by not providing proper notice and other procedural safeguards, there could be a viable claim in due process, ”the ruling said.

The question is therefore whether there was a real emergency that justified the order, according to the judge’s decision. This is a question in court that is currently unanswered.

City attorney Jim True could not be reached for immediate comment on Tuesday. The city has 21 days to respond to the TRO request from the date of service.

Neiley’s ruling also said the TRO motion failed to adequately demonstrate that the moratorium is causing economic harm to the 800 members of the Aspen Realtors Board, as well as 500 other affiliated members which include architects, planners, contractors, property managers, lawyers and others in the residential development and short-term rental industry.

“At this point, the claims of immediate harm and irreparable harm are purely speculative,” the ruling said. “At a minimum, the Court believes that the City should be given the opportunity to defend itself against the allegations (ABOR) of irreparable harm and to develop the case more fully.”

Bryan said the moratorium, now three weeks old, has already put a “bunch of people stuck in limbo – homeowners who might want to renovate their homes, people who want to sell their homes but no one is going to buy their properties.” unknowingly and understand the new land use code changes that the city council has yet to consider.

The lawsuit, meanwhile, seeks an injunction and a declaratory judgment that the moratorium is unenforceable. The lawsuit identified the five council office holders as individual defendants, as well as the town of Aspen.

The residential moratorium is in place until June 8, with the short-term rental break due to be lifted after September 30.

rcarroll@aspentimes.com


Source link

]]>
Death notice of Jean Hilliard (1939 – 2021) – Boise, ID https://ballingertx.org/death-notice-of-jean-hilliard-1939-2021-boise-id/ Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:35:32 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/death-notice-of-jean-hilliard-1939-2021-boise-id/ Jean Hilliard May 13, 1939 – December 17, 2021 Boise, Idaho – Wandella Jean Hilliard, 82, died on December 17, 2021 in Boise, Idaho. Wandella Jean Hilliard but her preferred name was Jean, was born in Vale, Oregon on May 13, 1939, to Clarence and Lois Rule. She had two sisters and a brother who […]]]>
Jean Hilliard
May 13, 1939 – December 17, 2021
Boise, Idaho – Wandella Jean Hilliard, 82, died on December 17, 2021 in Boise, Idaho.
Wandella Jean Hilliard but her preferred name was Jean, was born in Vale, Oregon on May 13, 1939, to Clarence and Lois Rule. She had two sisters and a brother who all predeceased her. She was the last survivor of her family. She married Harold Hilliard the love of her life on November 15, 1958. Harold and Jean moved to Payette, Idaho and began their life together. They preferred to live in a country environment so they moved to Ontario, Oregon. They lived in Ontario for only a year, before moving to Boise, Idaho, due to job changes. Jean enjoyed living the rest of his life in Boise.
Jean was a loving spirit. Our mother has become the best friend of everyone she has met. She listened, always took time for others and was very sensitive to everyone’s needs. Our mother loved being with her family and friends. She excelled at organizing family reunions, creating memorable vacations and was always a caring person.
She was a fantastic cook and her baked goods were delicious. Each year, the family looked forward to their delicious cinnamon rolls and savory pies at gatherings and vacations.
Jean liked to stay active and spend time with her family, but she also liked spending time with several of her friends. She has been instrumental in many groups or organizations in which she has participated. She founded a group called the Jumperets in Payette, Idaho. The Jumperets were a rope-skipping and twirling group. She was also involved in Girl Scouts and became the Ward President and shared the role of Boy Scout Leader with Harold in Boy Scouts. After Boy Scouts, Jean was involved in the Good Sam’s Club and Capital Gypsies. Jean shared the role with Harold in the Good Sams Club as the game coordinator and made many new acquaintances, who became lifelong friends. Throughout her involvement in these groups, she enjoyed every minute of the adventure and had a good time.
She was a loving wife, mother, grandmother and great-grandmother. She knew how to make any environment fun for everyone and make everyone feel welcome. Our mother loved life and always lived it to the fullest. We all loved her so much and will be sadly missed, may she rest in peace.
She is survived by her husband of 63 years, Harold Hilliard; his daughter Pam Ziegenfuss (Joel), his son Jeff Hilliard (Laurie) and his son Kim Hilliard (Sharla); seven grandchildren, two adopted grandchildren, three great grandchildren and her precious dog Chume.
A visitation and visitation will be held from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Monday, December 27, 2021 at Accent Funeral Home in Meridian. A funeral service will be held at 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 28, 2021 at Valley Shepard Church of the Nazarene, followed by a burial at Meridian Cemetery. Everyone is invited to lunch at Valley Shepherd immediately after services.
A link for the live stream and to leave condolences to the family, please visit Jean’s web page at www.AccentFuneral.com

Posted by Idaho Statesman on Dec 26, 2021.


Source link

]]>
Covid News: White House promises more Covid treatments https://ballingertx.org/covid-news-white-house-promises-more-covid-treatments/ Sat, 25 Dec 2021 15:19:31 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/covid-news-white-house-promises-more-covid-treatments/ The Supreme Court has set arguments on the two measures for January 7.Credit…Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court said Wednesday evening it would hold a special hearing next month to assess the legality of two initiatives at the heart of the Biden administration’s efforts to tackle the coronavirus in […]]]>
Credit…Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court said Wednesday evening it would hold a special hearing next month to assess the legality of two initiatives at the heart of the Biden administration’s efforts to tackle the coronavirus in the workplace.

The court said it would act with exceptional speed on the two measures, a vaccine or testing mandate for large employers and a vaccination requirement for some healthcare workers, making the case for Friday, January 7. The judges were not due to return to the bench until the following Monday.

Both sets of cases were part of what critics call the shadow court case, in which the court rules on emergency requests, sometimes on matters of great importance, without full briefing or argumentation. The court’s decision to hear arguments on the claims may have been a response to growing criticism of the practice.

The more drastic of the two measures, targeting companies with 100 or more employees, would affect more than 84 million workers and is at the heart of the administration’s efforts to fight the pandemic. The administration estimated that the measure would vaccinate 22 million people and avoid 250,000 hospitalizations.

The second measure requires health care workers in hospitals that receive federal money to be vaccinated against the virus. It will “save hundreds if not thousands of lives every month,” the administration wrote in an emergency request.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld state vaccine mandates in various contexts against constitutional challenges. But the new cases are different, because they primarily pose the question of whether Congress authorized the executive branch to institute the requirements.

The answer will depend mainly on the language of the relevant laws, but there is reason to believe that the conservative majority of six judges on the court will be skeptical of the executive branch’s general claims.

The last time the Supreme Court reviewed a Biden administration program to fight the pandemic – a moratorium on evictions – judges shut it down.

“Our system does not allow agencies to act illegally even in the pursuit of desirable ends,” the court said in an unsigned notice in August about the dissent of the three liberal judges.

In a statement released Wednesday evening, the Biden administration pledged to vigorously defend the initiatives.

“Especially since the United States is faced with the highly transmissible variant of Omicron, it is essential to protect workers with vaccination requirements and testing protocols that are urgently needed,” said Jen Psaki. , the White House press secretary, adding: “We have confidence in the legal authority. for both policies.

The vaccination or testing requirement for large employers was issued in November by the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA.

Employers are allowed to give their workers the option of getting tested every week instead of getting vaccinated, although they are not required to pay for the test. The rule makes an exception for employees who do not come into close contact with other people at their work, such as those who work from home or exclusively outside.

Under a 1970 statute, OSHA has the power to make emergency rules for workplace safety, provided it can demonstrate that workers are exposed to serious danger and that the rule is necessary.

States, businesses and religious groups have challenged the measure in courts of appeals across the country, and a unanimous panel of three judges from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans, had ruled in favor of some of the challengers, blocking the measure.

Last week, after the challenges were consolidated in the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, a divided three-judge panel restored the measure.

“The record establishes that Covid-19 continued to spread, mutate, kill and block the safe return of American workers to their jobs,” Majority Judge Jane B. Stranch wrote. “To protect workers, OSHA can and should be able to respond to hazards as they evolve. “

Dissenting, Justice Joan L. Larsen wrote that the administration “likely lacks the authority of Congress” to impose the vaccine or test requirement.

“The mandate is directly aimed at protecting the unvaccinated from their own choices,” she wrote. “Vaccines are available free of charge and unvaccinated people can choose to protect themselves at any time. “

Almost immediately, more than a dozen challengers asked the Supreme Court to block the measure.

The second set of cases the court has agreed to hear relate to the requirement that healthcare workers in hospitals receiving federal money be vaccinated against the coronavirus.

Federal judges in Missouri and Louisiana blocked the requirement, which provides exemptions for people with medical or religious objections, in rulings that apply in about half of the states.

In the 10-state Missouri case, Judge Matthew T. Schelp ruled that the administration exceeded its statutory authority in issuing the requirement and did not follow the proper procedures to do so. A three-judge split panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in St. Louis refused to stay the decision while an appeal progressed.

In the Louisiana case, brought by 14 states, Judge Terry A. Doughty blocked the requirement for similar reasons. Calling it a “close appeal,” a panel of three judges from the Fifth Circuit declined to issue a suspension while the administration appealed.

The requirement, Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar told the court, was underpinned by “both science and common sense.”

“Require healthcare workers at facilities participating in Medicare and Medicaid to be vaccinated,” she wrote, “protects the health and safety of patients in these facilities by reducing their risk of contracting the virus that causes Covid- 19. “

The Supreme Court had previously requested responses to emergency requests in both sets of cases by December 30, suggesting it would issue orders soon after without hearing arguments. His decision to do so followed a roughly similar pattern in challenges to an abortion law in Texas. Here too, the judges scheduled the pleadings according to an exceptionally accelerated schedule.

Correction:

An earlier version of this article was flawed when the Supreme Court asked for answers to emergency requests in two sets of cases concerning vaccination warrants. The court asked for the answers by December 30, not January 30.


Source link

]]>
New COVID-19 vaccine rule surprises many Kenyans https://ballingertx.org/new-covid-19-vaccine-rule-surprises-many-kenyans/ Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:10:00 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/new-covid-19-vaccine-rule-surprises-many-kenyans/ NAIROBI, Dec.23 (Reuters) – Kenya’s sudden decision to require proof of vaccination for access to public places and transport met with a combination of bewilderment, dismissal and occasional points of execution on Thursday as people were going home for Christmas. Buses in the capital’s buses did not ask for vaccination certificates, but insisted that passengers […]]]>

NAIROBI, Dec.23 (Reuters) – Kenya’s sudden decision to require proof of vaccination for access to public places and transport met with a combination of bewilderment, dismissal and occasional points of execution on Thursday as people were going home for Christmas.

Buses in the capital’s buses did not ask for vaccination certificates, but insisted that passengers were wearing masks and disinfecting their hands.

“We have not yet reached the stage of asking passengers to prove that they are vaccinated. Maybe we will start next year,” said bus driver Peter Wangari.

Register now for FREE and unlimited access to Reuters.com

The announcement on Wednesday night surprised many people, but comes amid an increase in COVID-19 cases. The test positivity rates on Thursday were 32.5%, down from 0.7% on November 21 when the edict was announced, the health ministry said.

The ministry previously said proof of vaccination would be required by December 21 to access schools, transportation, state offices, hotels, bars, restaurants, national parks and wildlife sanctuaries. . Read more

But a court then suspended the rule amid uncertainty over who would monitor it or what to do with people unable to access vaccines. The decree remains in force despite the government’s latest announcement. Read more

At Westgate’s upscale shopping center, customers entered freely and only one of its half-dozen restaurants enforced the edict.

Eight people stood in front of Artcaffe as a woman dressed in a black uniform and sky blue mask demanded vaccination certificates. Six potential customers left frustrated. The woman said about half of their clients have been turned away.

“We started because the government expects us to do it, even though we are getting negative reactions from our customers who do not want to show their certificates,” Joyce Imbaya, director, told Reuters. “It’s okay, we’re going to lose customers, but in the long run we want our customers to be safe.”

About 9.2 million Kenyans are vaccinated, of which 3.7 million are fully vaccinated.

On Thursday, around 20 people stood in front of a tented vaccination site in the city center on Thursday. Many said they were already planning to get the vaccine, but a few said they did so to avoid travel issues.

“Tomorrow I am going home. I have been told that if I am not going to take the jab then I will not be allowed to travel,” businessman Peter Juma Amboka told Reuters.

On Thursday, the head of the African Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expressed concern that vacation travel could fuel the peak.

“The fourth wave, and potentially the fifth wave, begins just before the start of the holidays, and that is very concerning,” director John Nkengasong said in a briefing.

Register now for FREE and unlimited access to Reuters.com

Reporting by George Obulutsa, Katharine Houreld; additional reporting by James Macharia Chege in Johannesburg and Monicah Mwangi in Nairobi; edited by Giles Elgood

Our Standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.


Source link

]]>
Welsh government has said to ‘urgently reconsider’ fines for those who do not work from home https://ballingertx.org/welsh-government-has-said-to-urgently-reconsider-fines-for-those-who-do-not-work-from-home/ Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:26:29 +0000 https://ballingertx.org/welsh-government-has-said-to-urgently-reconsider-fines-for-those-who-do-not-work-from-home/ // = do_shortcode (‘[in-content-square]’)?> Photo from Hunters Race on Unsplash The Welsh government has been urged to ‘urgently reconsider’ fines for those who can work from home but fail to do so. Wales Liberal Democrats leader Jane Dodds said it would hurt those who have been forced to work by their bosses. Unions such as […]]]>
// = do_shortcode (‘[in-content-square]’)?>

Photo from Hunters Race on Unsplash

The Welsh government has been urged to ‘urgently reconsider’ fines for those who can work from home but fail to do so.

Wales Liberal Democrats leader Jane Dodds said it would hurt those who have been forced to work by their bosses.

Unions such as the GMB and TUC have both criticized the move that would see workers given a fixed penalty notice of £ 60 for breaking the homework rule.

“This policy is not a solution to the problems we face and the Welsh Labor government should change it immediately,” said Jane Dodds.

“Employees should not be punished for potentially following instructions from a bad boss or an employer who does not follow instructions.

“Employers who are vulnerable to exploitation or coercion will be the most vulnerable to these fines and the Welsh government has failed to understand that the relationship between employee and employer is more often than not equal.

“I urge the government to reconsider urgently.”

“Bad deal”

A Welsh government spokesperson defended the rule, saying the additional measures had been introduced “to limit the spread of the virus and protect public health”.

“Following our long-standing advice for people to work from home whenever possible, starting Monday it will now be a legal requirement to work from home unless there is a reasonable excuse for not doing so. not do it, ”they said.

“We expect employers to take all reasonable steps to make it easier to work from home and provide employees with the support they need.”

But TUC Wales General Secretary Shavanah Taj said her reaction was a reaction of “shock and concern”.

“A worker is not responsible for his workplace, his employer is,” she said. “This sets a really disturbing precedent that the responsibility is somehow shared, and naïve at best.”

Meanwhile, senior GMB organizer Kelly Andrews said it was “hitting the wrong rope.”

“We are very concerned that this will lead bad employers to pressure their workers to work from home without a paper trail and put them at no financial risk,” she said.

“These workers are also the most vulnerable and can least afford the financial blow. But the truth is, for many families, a £ 60 Christmas fine will have a severe financial impact. “


Source link

]]>